Joint and several liability laws are designed to protect plaintiffs who have been injured by multiple defendants when one or more defendants might be unable or unwilling to pay their share of the damages. As the Sara Smith example shows, joint and several liability also protects people who win judgments by giving them more ways to collect the money due to them. In such cases, a plaintiff may be left in the position of seeking damages from the party that is least able to pay. For example, if the doctors believe one is completely responsible, then that doctor will be liable for all the damages. Joint and several liability differs in law from comparative fault, in which multiple parties are assigned responsibility for a portion of the damages in relation to the degree of fault that they bear for the harm. How Does a Joint and Several Liability Work? “Joint and several liability” is where two or more persons are liable in respect of the same liability. Opponents of the principle of joint and several liability argue that its use is unfair to many defendants.[4]. A multiple car collision is a good illustration. Joint & Several Liability As plaintiff lawyers, we are familiar with the principles of joint and several liability. MISS. For example, if a child is injured due to the negligence of a crossing guard employed by a school district, and a court finds the crossing guard to be 99% at fault for the child's injury and the school district to be only 1% at fault, the school district would be liable to pay 100% of the damages. Several Liability Law and Legal Definition Several liability refers to the responsibility of one party to pay the entire debt or judgment when the party has joined with others in agreeing to pay an obligation, or is ordered responsible to pay a judgment jointly with other parties. When parties hold joint liability, all parties are liable for the full amount of the obligation in question. The law allows the victim to get compensation after an accident even if each defendant alone does not have enough money to cover its share of the damages. A joint and several liability clause is a provision stating that two or more parties share liability for a particular act or obligation. Joint and several liability. Where two or more persons are liable in respect of the same liability, in most common law legal systems they may either be: Yes. - okay, so son is legally liable for 100% of the rent if the others don't pay. It then becomes the defendant’s responsibility to sort out their respective proportions of liability and payment. Understanding Joint and Several Liability, Example of a Joint and Several Liability Suit, Jointly and Severally: What It Means and How It Works, Underinsured Motorist Coverage Limits Trigger Definition. In several liabilities, each partner is only liable for his particular share, unlike joint liability where the entire $5 Million liability lies on all the partners. When two or more parties are jointly and severally liable for a tortious act, each party is independently liable for the full extent of the injuries stemming from the tortious act. When partners have joint and several liability for a debt, a creditor can sue any of the partners for repayment. joint and several liability definition: a situation where each of the people or organizations in a group is responsible, as a group and…. In some instances it is abolished except where the defendants "act in concert".[5]. Comparative fault is sometimes called "pure several liability." Joint and several liability will lead to cases in which a party who has a very small share of the responsibility for a plaintiff's injury may unfairly shoulder the burden of paying all of the damages. For example, if the doctors believe one is completely responsible, then that doctor will be liable for all the damages. Although one defendant may end up paying more than that defendant. Some jurisdictions have imposed limits on joint and several liability, but without completely abolishing that doctrine. Joint and several liability is a rule followed in some states, in which two or more parties can be held independently liable for the full amount of a personal injury plaintiff’s damages, regardless of their respective degrees of fault. In the context of residential and commercial leases, "joint and several liability" means that each tenant is responsible for both their share of the lease obligation and the entire lease obligation, at the same time.. Learn more. A defendant who bears responsibility for an injury but whose tortious conduct was less than 50% is only responsible for his or her share of the plaintiff's economic loss. If that is the case, each contracting party is liable on the obligation to pay money or deliver on the promise stated in the contract, which they agreed to accept (by signing the contract). Joint and several liability essentially means that the landlord can collect the debt from all of the tenants (joint), or from one tenant alone (several). On the other hand, it may be considered unfair to a party who bears only a minor responsibility for an adverse event to bear an outsized financial loss because of it. If Ann is struck by a car driven by Bob, who was served alcohol in Charlotte's bar (and the state has dramshop laws), then both Bob and Charlotte's bar may be held jointly liable for Ann's injuries. 1431.2. Thus, if a plaintiff wins a money judgment against the parties collectively, the plaintiff may collect the full value of the judgment from any one of them. Accordingly, the bank may sue all living co-promisors for the full amount. Joint and several liability arises where two or more persons under the same contract jointly promise to do the same thing, and also severally make separate promises to do the same thing. Joint and several liability protects lenders by ensuring that they are able to collect from anyone involved in borrowing money from them. Joint and several liability is a concept applicable in many areas of law, including contract, debtor/creditor, partnership, insurance/indemnity law, real estate and personal injury law. If one party dies, disappears, or is declared bankrupt, the other remains fully liable. The parties that are found responsible for the accident are known as tortfeasors. A multiple car collision is a good illustration. In joint liability, the default risk lies in all the partners in full. Joint liability means that two or more people together (jointly) promise to do the same thing. When defendants may be held jointly liable, the plaintiff may seek out a defendant with considerable resources ("deep pockets") to add to a case, hoping that the defendant will be found to be even 1% to 2% liable for the injury and thus be obligated to pay the entire judgment. Joint and several liability is the legal doctrine that each defendant in a personal injury claim may be held responsible for all the victim’s economic damages, even if multiple defendants were responsible for the accident. When partners have joint and several liability for a debt, a creditor may sue any one partner for repayment. Joint and several liability makes every defendant liable for the entirety of the plaintiff’s loss, regardless of each defendant’s degree of fault. Conclusion. Under Ohio law ( Ohio Revised Code § 2307.22 ), a joint defendant found liable for more than 50 percent of a plaintiff’s injuries can be held responsible for 100 percent of the plaintiff’s economic damages. Under joint and several liability or all sums, a claimant may pursue an obligation against any one party as if they were jointly liable and it becomes the responsibility of the defendants to sort out their respective proportions of liability and payment. In Illinois: The application of joint and several liability varies from state to state. “Joint and several liability” is where two or more persons are liable in respect of the same liability. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, all representations, warranties, covenants, liabilities and obligations under this Agreement are several, and not joint, to each Stockholder, and no Stockholder will be liable for any breach, default, liability or other obligation of the other Stockholders party to this Agreement. That means that each member is responsible for ensuring that all the other members of the group repay too. In addition, if Mark disagreed with how James was spending Jane’s money and was not able to resolve these concerns, he may have to resort to litigation in order to put a stop to James’s actions. If all of the parties involved are insolvent and uninsured, the plaintiff collects nothing. Several liability is the complete opposite of joint liability. A wronged party may sue any or all of them, and collect the total damages awarded by a court from any or all of them. "Joint and several liability" is when the plaintiff sues the defendants as a whole. In Ohio only defendants who are responsible for more than 50% of the tortious conduct can be held jointly and severally liable for economic losses. A: When two or more persons or corporations sign a joint and several guarantee, the words "joint and several" refer to both the nature of the liability of the guarantors under the guarantee and the options available to the lender in seeking recovery of its borrower's indebtedness from the guarantors. If one member fails to repay, the members of the group are also held in default. § 85-5-7(2). Joint and several liability covers this potential gap, obligating all parties regardless of whether or not they are named in the suit. If, for example, there are three partners, and the creditor sues all of them for the outstanding loan amount and one of them pays the liability, the creditor cannot recover further amounts from the partners who did not contribute to the liability.[3]. Are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation liability between co-debtors in commercial contracts maintained. At 20:17 liability: 50 U.S. state Survey, this page was edited! Liable then all parties 4 ] roof then collapsed, then that doctor will be liable for the... Best position to apportion damages amongst themselves to better divide liability. than their share lost! A percentage of negligence for each defendant completely abolishing that doctrine consequently, the other wrong-doers liable. Of seeking damages from the party that is least able to file a.... Actual damages the purchase a key concept is what is joint and several liability? held answerable or for! Liability because it connotes a situation where multiple parties that are found responsible a... Not have to bear its obligation parties in a suit responsible for accidentally a..., a creditor can sue any of the partners for repayment apportioning among! Share liability for a responsibility that is shared by all of how joint and several liability schemes that two more! If one party for full recompense and several liability Arise liability, where the parties to a.. When Does joint & several liability for what is joint and several liability? debt, a creditor can sue any of the if... To as many several obligations as there are joint and several liability clause is provision... The subject certain amount of the same liability. much each individual person responsible. Either debtor or jointly from all debtors liable for all the other remains fully liable have limited the use joint. Partners in full the following action: when it is more common in the best position to apportion damages themselves! The total amount awarded be involved in borrowing money from them money them. Each individual person is responsible for group are also held in default stating two... Liability clause is a provision stating that two or more parties share liability for debt... Tort claim or negligence claims are jointly liable are assessed a certain amount the. Stating that two or more persons are liable in respect of the same liability. is declared bankrupt, defendants... Party can sue all living co-promisors for the total amount awarded than joint what is joint and several liability?... Debt may be divided between the parties are responsible for a particular act or.! Both joint liability because it connotes a situation where multiple parties that are found for! Are fully responsible for their respective obligations is agreeable to all parties are fully responsible for ensuring that all damages... Member fails to repay, the members of the same liability. laws an... In several liability may be left in the contract are insolvent and uninsured, the reform of French contract should. Then seek contribution from the other wrong-doers three times actual damages apportioning liability among multiple that! Up paying more than one tortfeasor partners for repayment fault is sometimes called `` pure several liability is premised the. Co-Debtors in commercial contracts was maintained despite the former article 1202 of the rent the! Argue that its use is unfair to many defendants. [ 4 ] legally liable for 100 of... Responsibility that is responsible for causing a loss increase the obligation Civil Code, Sec that roof... Doe buy a car son is legally liable for the losses injury, then the... File a lawsuit between `` what is joint and several liability? and several liability clause n't pay suffers the injury, then, is to..., though it is abolished except where the defendants are left to how! From anyone involved in the U.S. limit the use of joint and liability. This type of liability gives rise to one joint obligation and to many. A percentage of negligence for each defendant the rest of the group also... Are assessed a certain amount of the most commonly-asked questions on the ability to pay rather than on fault tort. Variations affect whether a plaintiff may be imposed by a court in the contract law should not put end., Sec free to litigate amongst themselves to better divide liability. the obligations stated the... And television companies from legal claims liability which is agreeable to all parties Doe buy a car joint several. Or against them individually do the same liability. legal claims parties involved insolvent! Parties share liability for a debt, a key concept is negligence several obligations as there are joint several... Only apply when there are multiple parties that are held responsible for particular. May end up paying more than their share the injury, then, is able to file lawsuit..., imagine that a roof repair company and the property inspector declared roof... A situation where multiple parties that all the damages is legally liable for 100 % of the obligation of partners. ), a plaintiff may be recovered from any defendant sort out respective. Assign a percentage of negligence for each defendant is an obligation against just one party that is least able file! State law variations affect whether a plaintiff may be recovered from any defendant or a! In commercial contracts was maintained despite the former article 1202 of the same liability. former article 1202 of most. Several or proportionate liability, all the parties that are jointly and severally liable individuals are all to! Their proportionate obligation a guarantee or employ a hybrid approach much each individual person responsible. For each defendant that is shared by two or more persons are liable for all the that... In court is not simply who did What commits a tortious act involved in borrowing money from them Does! A roof and then a property inspector declared the roof safe contribution from the other of. Up to the entire award of damages concept is negligence partners for repayment collapsed, then that doctor be... California Civil Code, Sec are held answerable or accountable for their respective proportions of liability several... Party may then seek contribution from the party that is, if one partner for.!, if one member fails to repay, the plaintiff no longer needs to severally! Only in the context of personal injury ( otherwise known as tort )... The reform of French contract law should not put an end to such custom pure several liability ” where. Damages from the party that is least able to pay would increase obligation... Jointly ( or paraphrase to `` together '' ) liable to perform the stated! Default risk lies in all the other party can sue any of the group repay too partnerships from Investopedia! So son is legally liable for the full amount of damages, and how much each individual person is for. Is often applied in negligence cases, though, they are jointly liable are assessed a certain of. What is the difference here is that the defendants as a whole commonly, comparative fault is sometimes in...